Thank you for your kind response ML. I agree that we must accept an accurate interpretation of the word. I suppose that interpretation is more antithetical than the environment then. I believe in the biblical interpretation of man and God's side. The Bible must be decrypted before you can understand the text? I don't believe this exact system of looking at the interpretation. Of course, we can profane numerous biblical generalities, so we always involve good preceptors and a thorough knowledge of sanctioned history. All of this is so complicated in moment's social world with all the other training. There's so important to know widely and you can no way get tired of it. Sacred Scripture also has an indefatigable power of renewal. The words of Holy Scripture are a spiritual light, which infuses extraordinary power into private contemplation. The sacred textbook particularly speaks of wisdom and brings out an eternal verity like a prism, it has so numerous conceivable angles and multiple gleanings that transcend worldly wisdom. The political wisdom of the world obtains a singular verity. He simply doesn't have an acceptable understanding of the godly nature of spiritual verity. He tries in vain to slightly deny theories and the relative study of the spiritual side of man. The wisdom of the world is superficial and fleeting. It's not satisfying, it's saddening. The wisdom of God gives life and the wisdom of the world produces death. Now, this other interpretation, which I want to describe adequately, is a harmonious worldview of clashing philosophical generalities. We've adequately communicated unequivocal language of God, and it seems that we seek to transcend language, consciously limiting our capability to see God duly through these distinct generalities. Is that each,all?LORD is eternal?I like to talk about the theology of the academy and God is X.