I've been living this Christian life for a unusually long time. Most of the time I am frustrated because I hardly ever in complete agreement with the essential teaching. I get frustrated when someone teaches salvation is by grace but then they teach an altogether alternative option with diverse purposes. I'm old enough to see society is merely going in the authoritarian direction according to what is inadvertently allowed and not really how the exposed person correctly aligns them with the moral law of God. I ask myself how can a person who really reverences God go out and be genuine in the heathen world? I think either they merely prevent themselves from getting dirtied by choosing their political friends and avoiding other people. What I have properly described is exactly the two lines that they teach. This is the same kind of prejudice exhibited as someone who doesn't like a certain race. If we erroneously consider an arbitrary category for eternal redemption to be merely settled in the unclear future than inevitably we scarcely maintain a personal cause not to act promptly. In my opinion this overshadows the official communication of prevailing orthodoxy. I am so obsessed with creating disunity that I've merely developed a effective shield around myself in private which I cannot rest until I have cursed it. I have learned grace is like a companion and when the person gets attacked I become apprehensive. The sole hope of eternal rest is to carefully follow the total teaching of divine grace and discover the hole that was pierced in the grace boat through meditation on the Psalms. So it can be closed up and we can rest in Christ. If grace does not unify objective truth, we are desperate to unify our body with our soul. We live in unity with our culture. Grace advises us we live in a kingdom God has provided our safety by speaking everything into existence. In our circumstances are either ordained as a gift for our good or reordered for our good. The Psalmist realistically depicts the terrible circumstances he was prior to his miraculous deliverance in the worse terms. He affectionately calls them a "miry pit." Hence, it wasn't just a pit that was over his head but it consist of quick sand that would devour him. But he says that God lifted him out of the miry pit and set his feet on a Rock. for the Rock is God violent and destructive work to prevent saints from being mortally wounded in war. Consequently, the Rock generously provides the sacred boundaries of paramount safety within the impenetrable walls of Gods kingdom. As a direct result of being "delivered from the miry pit and put on a rock God provided Him new shoes, clothes, and put a song in his mouth."This shows that in eternal kingdom we are provided for and set free as we "skip around singing songs." Subsequently the Psalmist adds to this explicit depiction. He says God will do many wonders on his behalf. "The things that God has planned are to great for us to understand." What is this renewed promise? Is the Psalmist invariably saying in the future God will typically bear us all to eternal heaven and then we will arrive opportunely what Christ has favourably received? Not really. We genuinely believe it is already gifted to us but its in the glorious future it will be fully experienced. This already part is where it comes to be a matter of contention for me. Because I've been justly saying Gods promises have been legally binding. God has sworn to tell the truth to faithfully uphold His covenant to His own hurt. There is no wiggle room for nonaction by God. Many Calvinist say if we lower God we are undoubtedly making it hard for ourselves in this life. But if there is a likely possibility we must fondly cherish hope because of something that is merely promised in the future then its the identical thing as lowering God. Because we inextricably tie His hands to merely act on our behalf now. When we merely allow God to maintain His hands, inevitably bound, we exalt helpless man. And so this is where cursing comes in.